ComtIQMONITOR · ANALYZE · ANTICIPATE

Track record

Every forecast we publish, scored in public

Each ComtIQ report ends with dated forecasts on where the rule will land. Every one is listed here with its probability and the test that settles it. When the final rule or the court decision comes out, we score it, and misses stay on the page next to hits.

47Forecasts loggedAcross 6 reports
0ResolvedFirst due Dec 31, 2026
n/aMean Brier scoreNo forecast has resolved yet. The first is due Dec 31, 2026.
n/aCalls on the right sideRoughly even calls are left out

Next to resolve

The forecasts with a date attached

Most forecasts resolve when the agency publishes the final rule. These ones have a fixed deadline.

  1. Dec 31, 2026The rescission stays in effect through the end of 2026Very likely (80-95%) · EPA endangerment finding rescission · EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0194 S1
  2. Jan 20, 2027The final rule is published before January 20, 2027Likely (55-80%) · Labor Department independent contractor rule · WHD-2026-0001 S1
  3. Jun 22, 2027Final rule effective before June 22, 2027Likely (55-80%) · BLM oil and gas leasing · BLM-2025-0037 S4
  4. Jun 30, 2027A D.C. Circuit merits decision before mid 2027Unlikely (20-45%) · EPA endangerment finding rescission · EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0194 S2
  5. Jun 30, 2027EPA grants a reconsideration petition in a way that changes the ruleVery unlikely (5-20%) · EPA endangerment finding rescission · EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0194 S3

All forecasts

The full log

Download the whole log as track-record.csv. Each report also publishes its own forecast log next to its data files.

ReportForecastLikelihoodLoggedResolvesResultBrier
EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0194
S1 · v1.3
The rescission stays in effect through the end of 2026
Settled by Rule in effect on December 31, 2026
Very likely
80-95%
High confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyDec 31, 2026open
WHD-2026-0001
S1 · v1.4
The final rule is published before January 20, 2027
Settled by Federal Register publication date
Likely
55-80%
Moderate confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyJan 20, 2027open
BLM-2025-0037
S4 · v1.1
Final rule effective before June 22, 2027
Settled by Effective date in the Federal Register
Likely
55-80%
Low confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyJun 22, 2027open
EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0194
S2 · v1.3
A D.C. Circuit merits decision before mid 2027
Settled by Opinion in No. 26-1037 by June 30, 2027
Unlikely
20-45%
Moderate confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyJun 30, 2027open
EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0194
S3 · v1.3
EPA grants a reconsideration petition in a way that changes the rule
Settled by EPA notice by June 30, 2027
Very unlikely
5-20%
Moderate confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyJun 30, 2027open
TREAS-DO-2026-0496
S1 · v1.0
Treasury publishes the final section 3 rule by 30 June 2027
Settled by Federal Register, RIN 1505-AC95
Roughly even
45-55%
Low confidence
Nov 6, 2026 · archived copyJun 30, 2027open
EPA-HQ-OW-2025-0654
S1 · v1.0
EPA publishes a final rescission rule by June 30, 2027
Settled by Federal Register, RIN 2040-AG53
Likely
55-80%
Low confidence
Nov 9, 2026 · archived copyJun 30, 2027open
FAA-2026-8614
S1 · v1.0
Final rule published by 31 December 2027
Settled by Federal Register
Likely
55-80%
Moderate confidence
Nov 3, 2026 · archived copyDec 31, 2027open
FAA-2026-8614
S6 · v1.0
Proposal withdrawn by 31 December 2027
Settled by Federal Register, Unified Agenda
Very unlikely
5-20%
Moderate confidence
Nov 3, 2026 · archived copyDec 31, 2027open
EPA-HQ-OW-2025-0654
S8 · v1.0
EPA proposes a new standard for any of the four PFAS by December 31, 2028
Settled by Federal Register
Unlikely
20-45%
Low confidence
Nov 9, 2026 · archived copyDec 31, 2028open
BLM-2025-0037
J1 · v1.1
Bond minimums of $10,000 and $25,000 appear in the final rule
Settled by Final rule text, 43 CFR 3104.1
Likely
55-80%
Moderate confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
BLM-2025-0037
J2 · v1.1
Final rule keeps both 30-day comment periods eliminated and a 10-day protest window, unchanged
Settled by Final rule text, 43 CFR 3120.42
Unlikely
20-45%
Moderate confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
BLM-2025-0037
J3 · v1.1
Bond minimums survive judicial review if challenged
Settled by Court ruling on the merits
Roughly even
45-55%
Moderate confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyCourt ruling on the meritsopen
BLM-2025-0037
J5 · v1.1
Royalty floor, four sales a year and noncompetitive leasing stay in force
Settled by Statute and BLM guidance at final rule
Almost certain
95-99%
High confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
BLM-2025-0037
R1 · v1.1
10-day protest window appears unchanged
Settled by Final rule text
Unlikely
20-45%
Moderate confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
BLM-2025-0037
R2 · v1.1
Both comment periods removed, unchanged
Settled by Final rule text
Unlikely
20-45%
Moderate confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
BLM-2025-0037
R3 · v1.1
$1 per page fee beyond 50 pages appears unchanged
Settled by Final rule text, 43 CFR 3000.120 and 3120.43
Unlikely
20-45%
Low confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
BLM-2025-0037
R4 · v1.1
Surface owner identification removal appears unchanged
Settled by Final rule text, 43 CFR 3120.31
Roughly even
45-55%
Low confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
BLM-2025-0037
R5 · v1.1
Nationwide bonds reinstated at $150,000
Settled by Final rule text, 43 CFR 3104
Likely
55-80%
Moderate confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
BLM-2025-0037
R6 · v1.1
Preference criteria removed
Settled by Final rule text, 43 CFR 3120.32
Very likely
80-95%
High confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
BLM-2025-0037
R7 · v1.1
Application fee set at $155
Settled by Final rule fee schedule
Very likely
80-95%
Moderate confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
BLM-2025-0037
S1 · v1.1
Bond minimums kept, one comment period restored or protest window lengthened, nationwide bonds reinstated
Settled by Final rule text
Likely
55-80%
Moderate confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
BLM-2025-0037
S2 · v1.1
Every discretionary provision adopted as proposed
Settled by Final rule text
Unlikely
20-45%
Moderate confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
BLM-2025-0037
S3 · v1.1
Bond minimums set above pre-2024 levels
Settled by Final rule text
Very unlikely
5-20%
High confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
BLM-2025-0037
S5 · v1.1
Lawsuit by states, conservation groups or taxpayer advocates within six months of publication
Settled by Court dockets
Very likely
80-95%
High confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copySix months after the final ruleopen
EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0194
S4 · v1.3
The final power plant rule again sets climate science comments aside as out of scope
Settled by Response to comments, EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0124
Likely
55-80%
Moderate confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyFinal power plant ruleopen
WHD-2026-0001
S2 · v1.4
The final rule keeps the two core factors and the extension to the FMLA and the MSPA
Settled by Final text, 29 CFR 795, 825 and 500
Very likely
80-95%
High confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
WHD-2026-0001
S3 · v1.4
The final rule creates a presumption of employee status in construction
Settled by Final text
Very unlikely
5-20%
High confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
WHD-2026-0001
S4 · v1.4
Worker groups, states or local governments sue within six months of publication
Settled by Court dockets
Likely
55-80%
Moderate confidence
Oct 25, 2026 · archived copySix months after the final ruleopen
FAA-2026-8614
S2 · v1.0
§ 400.3(c) narrowed or removed for airspace closures or airport layout plans
Settled by Final text of § 400.3(c)
Roughly even
45-55%
Low confidence
Nov 3, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
FAA-2026-8614
S3 · v1.0
Final list adds any of the eight statutes the FAA floated
Settled by Final text of § 400.3(b)
Unlikely
20-45%
Moderate confidence
Nov 3, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
FAA-2026-8614
S4 · v1.0
Final rule text or preamble states how the waiver applies where the Department of the Air Force or NASA runs its own environmental review at a federal range
Settled by Final rule and preamble
Likely
55-80%
Moderate confidence
Nov 3, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
FAA-2026-8614
S5 · v1.0
Lawsuit challenging the rule filed within six months of publication, if the final text keeps a categorical NEPA waiver
Settled by Court dockets
Likely
55-80%
Moderate confidence
Nov 3, 2026 · archived copySix months after the final ruleopen
TREAS-DO-2026-0496
S2 · v1.0
The final rule keeps service-provider reliance on a foreign issuer's representation after due diligence, § 1523.3(c)
Settled by Final text of § 1523.3(c)
Very likely
80-95%
Moderate confidence
Nov 6, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
TREAS-DO-2026-0496
S3 · v1.0
The final rule or preamble names official records, the OCC's section 18 list or Treasury's section 8 notices, as part of the required diligence
Settled by Final rule and preamble
Likely
55-80%
Moderate confidence
Nov 6, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
TREAS-DO-2026-0496
S4 · v1.0
Checking official lists alone satisfies the diligence duty, a full safe harbor
Settled by Final text of § 1523.3(c)
Unlikely
20-45%
Moderate confidence
Nov 6, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
TREAS-DO-2026-0496
S5 · v1.0
The reasonable-belief safe harbors in §§ 1523.2(c) and 1523.3(e) survive in some form
Settled by Final text of §§ 1523.2(c) and 1523.3(e)
Very likely
80-95%
Moderate confidence
Nov 6, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
TREAS-DO-2026-0496
S6 · v1.0
Treasury explains, in the preamble or in examples, how market making, distribution and infrastructure services relate to an unlawful issuance under § 1523.2(d)
Settled by Final preamble and Appendix A
Likely
55-80%
Moderate confidence
Nov 6, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
TREAS-DO-2026-0496
S7 · v1.0
The rule text of § 1523.2(d) adds an express coordination, purpose or material-connection requirement
Settled by Final text of § 1523.2(d)
Roughly even
45-55%
Low confidence
Nov 6, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
TREAS-DO-2026-0496
S8 · v1.0
§ 1523.2(d) becomes an exhaustive list
Settled by Final text of § 1523.2(d)
Unlikely
20-45%
Moderate confidence
Nov 6, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
TREAS-DO-2026-0496
S9 · v1.0
Treasury withdraws the proposal or issues a new proposal before a final rule
Settled by Federal Register, Unified Agenda
Very unlikely
5-20%
Moderate confidence
Nov 6, 2026 · archived copyFinal rule or withdrawalopen
EPA-HQ-OW-2025-0654
S2 · v1.0
If a final rule publishes, it rescinds the determinations and the standards for all four PFAS as proposed
Settled by Final rule text, 40 CFR 141.61
Likely
55-80%
Moderate confidence
Nov 9, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
EPA-HQ-OW-2025-0654
S3 · v1.0
The final rule keeps a monitoring or occurrence-data requirement for the four PFAS
Settled by Final rule text, 40 CFR 141.902 to 141.905
Unlikely
20-45%
Low confidence
Nov 9, 2026 · archived copyFinal ruleopen
EPA-HQ-OW-2025-0654
S4 · v1.0
EPA adopts the procedural cure, keeping the determinations and re-proposing the standards, instead of rescinding
Settled by Final rule, or a remand order
Very unlikely
5-20%
Moderate confidence
Nov 9, 2026 · archived copyFinal rule or remandopen
EPA-HQ-OW-2025-0654
S5 · v1.0
The D.C. Circuit decides American Water Works Association v. EPA before the final rescission publishes
Settled by D.C. Circuit opinion date against the Federal Register date
Roughly even
45-55%
Low confidence
Nov 9, 2026 · archived copyFinal rule or D.C. Circuit opinionopen
EPA-HQ-OW-2025-0654
S6 · v1.0
A petition for review of the final rescission is filed within the 45-day window of SDWA section 1448
Settled by Petition docketed in the D.C. Circuit
Almost certain
95-99%
High confidence
Nov 9, 2026 · archived copy45 days after the final ruleopen
EPA-HQ-OW-2025-0654
S7 · v1.0
If a final rescission publishes and is challenged, the court upholds it on the merits (a remand without vacatur counts as not upheld)
Settled by Court of appeals judgment
Roughly even
45-55%
Low confidence
Nov 9, 2026 · archived copyCourt of appeals judgmentopen

Calibration

Do our "likely" calls happen about as often as we say?

A forecaster is calibrated when events called "likely" (55 to 80%) happen roughly that often. We report the rate for each term once 20 forecasts have resolved, so a handful of early results does not pass for a trend.

TermBandLoggedResolvedHow often it happened
Very unlikely5-20%60after 20 resolve
Unlikely20-45%110after 20 resolve
Roughly even45-55%70after 20 resolve
Likely55-80%140after 20 resolve
Very likely80-95%70after 20 resolve
Almost certain95-99%20after 20 resolve

How we keep score

The rules, set before the first result

Likelihood and confidence are reported apart. Likelihood uses the seven terms of Intelligence Community Directive 203, from almost no chance (1 to 5%) to almost certain (95 to 99%). Confidence says how good the evidence is.

Every forecast names the test that settles it, usually the text of the final rule, a Federal Register date or a court docket. The result links to that source.

A forecast is never edited after publication. If our view changes, a new report version logs a new forecast with a new date, and the old one stays and is scored too.

A forecast resolves to 1 if the event happened and 0 if it did not. A conditional forecast whose condition never occurs is marked void and left out of every score.

The Brier score is the square of the gap between our probability, the midpoint of the band, and the result. A "likely" call scores 0.11 when it happens and 0.46 when it does not. Answering 50% to everything scores 0.25.

Where a report has an archived copy, the Logged column links to the Internet Archive, so anyone can check that the forecast was public on that date.

Forecasts are analysis, not legal or investment advice. Page built Nov 11, 2026.